And what’s missing here?

Link to the Times article.

“Experts” are quoted. Which experts? This is the first question that springs to mind. You guessed it… Environmentalists and Carbon-Capitalists (those invested in the Carbon trade). So we are hearing, once again, only one side of a highly politicised debate in which by use of the word “experts” we are assured of the neutrality of those views.
This is a con.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: